ABUJA — A defendant in the ongoing alleged coup trial before the Federal High Court has denied any involvement in a plot to overthrow the government, insisting he was unaware of any such plan.
The fourth defendant, Zekeri Umoru, made the claim in a video statement presented in court as part of the prosecution’s evidence against six individuals standing trial over the alleged conspiracy.
In the footage, Umoru said he was introduced to key figures in the case by Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, whom he knew through his work at the Presidential Villa. He explained that he initially believed he was engaging in legitimate business dealings, including electrical work opportunities.
He recounted receiving multiple cash payments from a man later identified as Colonel Mohammed Ma’aji, including a bag containing ₦8.8 million, as well as additional funds during subsequent meetings.
Umoru told investigators that he became suspicious over time and sought clarification, alleging that Ibrahim hinted at a broader plan to “sanitise the government.” Despite this, he maintained that he had no prior knowledge of any coup plot.
“I was misled,” Umoru stated in the video, adding that he would have distanced himself had he known the true intentions behind the meetings.
He also admitted facilitating access for an associate into the Presidential Villa but said he later cautioned the individual after noticing unusual activities.
In a related development, an Islamic cleric, Sheikh Imam Kassim Goni, also denied involvement, stating that funds he received were for prayers and charitable purposes. However, investigators cited financial records suggesting large transactions that raised further concerns.
The prosecution argued that elements in the video evidence—including discussions about access and logistics—point to a broader scheme, though all defendants have denied any role in a coup attempt.
Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the case to May 11, 12, and 13 for continuation of trial proceedings, following arguments between defence and prosecution over the review of newly presented evidence.
